Supreme Court to Review Whether "Offensive" Names Can Be Trademarked
September 29, 2016 | By: Lawrence Bluestone, Esq.
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed today to review the Federal Circuit’s decision to strike down the Lanham Act’s ban on “disparaging” trademarks. The case, Lee v. Tam, No. 15-1293, involved an Asian American dance-rock band’s attempt to trademark their name THE SLANTS. The U.S Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused, citing the Lanham Act’s prohibition on “disparaging” trademarks. The Federal Circuit held that this prohibition violated trademark applicants’ First Amendment Rights. (See Litigation Law Blog’s previous post about the Federal Circuit’s decision from December 23, 2015.)
The Supreme Court’s decision could impact the more famous battle over an attempt to cancel the trademark registration for the NFL’s Washington Redskins as disparaging to Native Americans.
In the Washington Redskins case, a federal district court had ruled that the football team’s trademark disparaged Native Americans. The team had appealed the case to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which was scheduled to hold oral argument in December. On October 18, 2016, the Fourth Circuit agreed to stay consideration of the appeal until the Supreme Court decides Lee v. Tam.
For more information on the Lanham Act or the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Lee v. Tam, please contact Kathleen Barnett Einhorn, Esq., Chair of the Firm's Complex Commercial Litigation Group, at email@example.com or Jennifer Borek, Esq., Partner in the Complex Commercial Litigation Group, at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Tags: Uncategorized • Litigation • Supreme Court • Lanham Act • First Amendment • Federal Circuit • trademark • Genova Burns • Genova Burns LLC • Jennifer Borek • Kathleen Barnett Einhorn • Lawrence Bluestone • First Amendment Rights • Washington Redskins