You searched for: NJLAD

Attorneys

Photo of Nicholas R. Amato

Nicholas R. Amato
Of Counsel
973.535.7136

Photo of Victor Andreou

Victor Andreou
Associate
973.646.3283

Photo of Matthew I. W. Baker

Matthew I. W. Baker
Counsel
973.646.3286

Photo of Thomas L. Bellifemine

Thomas L. Bellifemine
Associate
973.230.0162

Photo of Peter F. Berk

Peter F. Berk
Counsel
973.230.2071

Photo of Lawrence Bluestone

Lawrence Bluestone
Partner
973.535.4434

Photo of Jennifer Borek

Jennifer Borek
Partner
973.535.7107

Photo of Celia S. Bosco

Celia S. Bosco
Counsel
973.230.2088

Photo of Joseph A. Bottitta

Joseph A. Bottitta
Of Counsel
973.646.3290

Photo of James M. Burns

James M. Burns
Managing Partner
973.535.7101

Photo of Donald W. Clarke

Donald W. Clarke
Counsel
973.387.7804

Photo of Harrison C. Clewell

Harrison C. Clewell
Associate
973.535.4444

Photo of David P. Cooke

David P. Cooke
Of Counsel
973.309.6076

Photo of Sadayah Durant-Brown

Sadayah Durant-Brown
Associate
973.230.2078

Photo of Brigette N. Eagan

Brigette N. Eagan
Counsel
973.535.7114

Photo of Kathleen Barnett Einhorn

Kathleen Barnett Einhorn
Partner
973.535.7115

Photo of Rebecca Moll Freed

Rebecca Moll Freed
Partner
973.230.2075

Photo of Harris S. Freier

Harris S. Freier
Partner
973.230.2079

Photo of Maria R. Fruci

Maria R. Fruci
Counsel
973.646.3262

Photo of Thomas S. Garlick

Thomas S. Garlick
Associate
973.646.3273

Photo of Bruno Genova

Bruno Genova
Of Counsel
973.646.3261

Photo of Angelo J. Genova

Angelo J. Genova
Chairman
973.535.7100

Photo of Lauren W. Gershuny

Lauren W. Gershuny
Counsel
973.535.4447

Photo of Joseph M. Hannon

Joseph M. Hannon
Counsel
973.535.7105

Photo of William F. Harrison

William F. Harrison
Partner
973.535.4430

Photo of Avi R. Jerushalmy

Avi R. Jerushalmy
Associate
973.646.3295

Photo of Steven Z. Jurista

Steven Z. Jurista
Of Counsel
973.230.2097

Photo of Avi D. Kelin

Avi D. Kelin
Counsel
973.646.3267

Photo of Matthew Kertz

Matthew Kertz
Partner
973.230.2087

Photo of Gregory S. Kinoian

Gregory S. Kinoian
Counsel
973.646.3284

Photo of Keith A. Krauss

Keith A. Krauss
Of Counsel
973.535.4441

Photo of Latiqua M. Liles

Latiqua M. Liles
Associate
973.646.3287

Photo of Brian D. MacNiven

Brian D. MacNiven
Associate
973.387.7805

Photo of Christopher Manley

Christopher Manley
Associate
973.535.4433

Gary N. Marks
Of Counsel
973.646.3293

Photo of Dina M. Mastellone

Dina M. Mastellone
Partner
732.842.2732

Photo of Jennifer Mazawey

Jennifer Mazawey
Partner
973.535.7126

Photo of Nicole L. McCann

Nicole L. McCann
Associate
973.535.4443

Photo of James J. McGovern III

James J. McGovern III
Partner
973.535.7122

Photo of Patrick W. McGovern

Patrick W. McGovern
Partner
973.535.7129

Cynthia Hobson McNutt
Associate
973.646.3171

Photo of William F. Megna

William F. Megna
Partner
973.230.2074

Photo of Charles J. Messina

Charles J. Messina
Partner
973.646.3278

Photo of Albert Mezzaroba

Albert Mezzaroba
Of Counsel
215.564.0444

Photo of Romie Michel

Romie Michel
Associate
973.387.7808

Photo of Jared J. Monaco

Jared J. Monaco
Associate
973.535.7121

Richard Mongelli
Of Counsel

Photo of Emily K. Montagna

Emily K. Montagna
Associate
973.230.2080

Photo of Angela Pan

Angela Pan
Of Counsel
201.469.0100

Photo of Eugene T. Paolino

Eugene T. Paolino
Partner
201.249.8197

Photo of Rajiv D. Parikh

Rajiv D. Parikh
Partner
973.535.4446

Photo of Nicholas J. Pellegrino

Nicholas J. Pellegrino
Associate
973.230.2096

Photo of John C. Petrella

John C. Petrella
Partner
973.535.7108

Photo of Gerard D. Pizzillo

Gerard D. Pizzillo
Counsel
201.249.8361

Photo of Scott S. Rever

Scott S. Rever
Counsel
973.387.7801

Photo of Jeffrey R. Rich

Jeffrey R. Rich
Partner
732.758.0117

Photo of Herschel P. Rose

Herschel P. Rose
Associate
973.646.3276

Photo of Jennifer Roselle

Jennifer Roselle
Partner
973.646.3324

Photo of Ralph J. Salerno

Ralph J. Salerno
Of Counsel
973.535.4432

Brian M. Satz
Of Counsel
973.230.2093

Photo of Gina M. Schneider

Gina M. Schneider
Of Counsel
973.535.7134

Photo of Kenneth J. Sheehan

Kenneth J. Sheehan
Counsel
973.646.3292

Photo of Douglas E. Solomon

Douglas E. Solomon
Partner
973.535.7128

Photo of Leonard S. Spinelli

Leonard S. Spinelli
Counsel
973.230.2085

Photo of Daniel M. Stolz

Daniel M. Stolz
Partner
973.230.2095

Photo of John Suwatson

John Suwatson
Counsel
973.535.4431

Photo of Harvey Weissbard

Harvey Weissbard
Of Counsel
973.230.2084

Photo of Yostina Mishriky

Yostina Mishriky
Associate
973.230.2072



Practices:



General Search Results:

  • 11.03.2022

    Timing is Everything: NJ Appellate Division Compels Arbitration of Employee’s Sex Harassment Claims
    On October 26, 2022, the New Jersey Appellate Division in Rourke v. Herr Foods, Inc. once again confirmed that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts the 2019 amendment to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) invalidating employment agreements that require employees to waive rights pertaining to claims of harassment, discrimination and/or retaliation. Thus, the employee was required to proceed to arbitration on his sexual harassment, sexual assault and retaliation claims.

  • 09.15.2022

    Third Circuit Confirms ABC Test Applies in Wage Theft Case
    In a recent decision in Bailey v. Millennium Group of Delaware et al, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit confirmed that the ABC Test – long used by the New Jersey Department of Labor – sets forth the proper analysis for determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor under the State’s wage and hour laws.

  • 08.31.2022

    You Snooze You Lose: NJ Appellate Division Affirms Dismissal of Sleep Apnea Disability Bias Class Action
    On August 15, 2022, the New Jersey Appellate Division declined to reinstate a disability bias class action brought by a New Jersey Transit train operator who was required undergo a sleep apnea screening due to the results of his physical examination as required by NJ Transit’s policy stemming from safety concerns as a result of a 2016 train accident.

  • 06.21.2022

    Harris Freier Provides Input in New Jersey Law Journal Article "Fat Suit: Proposed Law Would Allow Weight-Discrimination Lawsuits"
    Firm Partner Harris S. Freier, Esq. was recently interviewed by New Jersey Law Journal for their recent article entitled "Fat Suit: Proposed Law Would Allow Weight-Discrimination Lawsuits" which focuses recent measures introduced in New Jersey Legislature that would amend Law Against Discrimination to bar discrimination based on weight or height.

  • 06.16.2022

    It’s Settled . . . Or Is It? NJ Appellate Division Rules The NJLAD Does Not Prohibit Non-Disparagement Clauses in Settlement Agreements
    On May 31, 2022, in Savage v. Township of Neptune, the New Jersey Appellate Division partially upheld, and partially overturned, a trial court’s enforcement of a private settlement agreement, holding that although the settlement agreement’s non-disparagement clause was enforceable and not violative of the statutory prohibition against enforcing non-disclosure provisions in harassment/discrimination/retaliation cases, the employee’s allegedly disparaging statements did not actually violate the non-disparagement clause as written.

  • 05.31.2022

    Is There a Problem Officer?: NJ Appellate Division Affirms Dismissal of Retired Police Officer’s Disability Lawsuit
    On May 23, 2022, the New Jersey Appellate Division upheld a trial court’s dismissal of failure to promote, hostile work environment, and retaliation claims brought by a retired New Jersey State Police Trooper. In Stonnell v. State of New Jersey, the Appellate Division affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the trooper’s New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) claims, finding that he failed to set forth facts sufficient to establish that the New Jersey State Police violated the law with respect to his employment.

  • 04.28.2022

    Glass Houses: Hostile Work Environment Claim Dismissed Due to Employee’s Own Unprofessional Conduct
    On April 19, 2022, in Bouziotis v. Iron Bar, LLC, the New Jersey Appellate Division upheld a trial court’s dismissal of a former bartender’s hostile work environment and gender discrimination claims partly on the grounds that employee partook in the “pejorative language and boorish conduct pervading Iron Bar’s atmosphere,” just as much as anyone else, regardless of gender. Because the former employee could not show that the alleged misconduct occurred “but for [her] gender,” the Appellate Division upheld the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the employer.

  • 04.25.2022

    Employer Documentation Saves the Day & Earns Dismissal of Age Bias Lawsuit
    On April 4, 2022, in the matter of Jane Rocks, et al. v. PNC Investments LLC, et al., a three-judge Appellate Panel affirmed the Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of PNC Investments LLC and dismissing the former employees’ claims of age discrimination, hostile work environment, and constructive discharge in violation of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD). The Appellate Division found the employees were unable to demonstrate that they were held to higher standards due to their age.

  • 04.05.2022

    Jennifer Roselle and Charles Messina Present "Cannabis in the Workplace" Webinar for New Jersey State League of Municipalities
    Genova Burns Partners and Cannabis Law specialists, Jennifer Roselle, Esq. and Charles J. Messina, Esq. recently presented a Professional Development webinar for the New Jersey State League of Municipalities entitled, "Cannabis in the Workplace."

  • 03.08.2022

    NJ Appellate Division Upholds Requests, Not Commands, By Employers to Maintain Confidentiality in Employment Investigations
    On February 28, 2022, the New Jersey Appellate Division ruled that a request for confidentiality by an investigator in connection with a discrimination or harassment investigation is valid and does not violate an employee’s right of free speech or the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD). In Usachenok v. State of New Jersey Department of the Treasury, et al., the Appellate Division denied an attempt made by a former employee to invalidate a regulation by the State's Civil Service Commission requesting confidentiality in connection with a harassment investigation.

  • 02.25.2022

    To Be Blunt: The NJLAD Does Not Bar Arbitration of Medical Marijuana User’s Employment Claims
    On February 15, 2022, the New Jersey Appellate Division upheld a trial court Order compelling arbitration of discrimination and wrongful termination claims brought by a former employee who was terminated for testing positive for marijuana. In a matter of first impression, the Appellate Division in Antonucci v. Curvature Newco, Inc. held that federal law governing arbitration preempts a 2019 amendment to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) invalidating employment agreements that require employees to waive certain rights, with respect to discrimination, retaliation, and/or harassment claims.

  • 01.18.2022

    Whose Burden is it Anyway? NJ Appellate Division Holds Employee Fails to Meet the Burden of Persuasion of Showing Discriminatory Intent
    Despite surviving summary judgment, securing a favorable verdict at the second trial, and being awarded counsel fees, Plaintiff’s gender discrimination case was abruptly dismissed by the Appellate Division. On January 3, 2022, the three-judge panel held that an employee in a discrimination case bears the burden of persuasion at all stages. This employee’s argument fell short of that burden, and her case was, therefore, dismissed.

  • 10.12.2021

    Employees 70 & Older Gain New Life With Expanded Protections Against Age Discrimination in the Workplace
    On October 5, 2021, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed legislation expanding the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) providing increased protections against age discrimination for workers 70 years of age and older. The new legislation closes loopholes by repealing provisions permitting age discrimination in hiring, promoting, and retirement practices, while increasing available remedies to those facing age discrimination in employment.

  • 07.20.2021

    Brigette Eagan Discusses Bill That Would Broaden NJ's Prohibition Against Age Discrimination in NJBIZ
    Genova Burns Counsel Brigette N. Eagan, Esq. discusses "Extended protection" A bill unanimously approved by both houses of the Legislature that would broaden the state’s prohibition against age discrimination in a recent NJBIZ article.

  • 07.06.2021

    NJ Supreme Court Issues A Grim Prognosis For Employers Facing Hostile Work Environment Claims
    After losing in both the trial and appellate courts, Armando Rios, Jr., an ex-Pharmaceutical Executive, managed to sway the minds of the Justices on the State’s highest court to revive his hostile work environment claim. Rios claimed his direct supervisor twice referred to Hispanics by a racial epithet thereby creating a hostile work environment. The lower courts held that two incidents are not severe or pervasive enough to constitute a hostile work environment and dismissed his case. A unanimous New Jersey Supreme Court, however, disagreed and reversed the lower court decisions.

  • 06.24.2021

    NJ District Court Gives Employers Hope in the Fight Against FMLA Misuse
    On May 28, 2021, the U.S. District for New Jersey in VanHook v. Cooper Health Systems, granted Cooper’s summary judgment against its employee’s discrimination and retaliation claims under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD), and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The District Court agreed with the employer that the record confirms the employee’s abusive and dishonest actions and granted the employer’s motion of summary judgment.

  • 06.22.2021

    NJ Supreme Court Strikes Adverse Employment Action Requirement in Failure to Accommodate Claims
    On June 8, 2021, the New Jersey Supreme Court in Richter v. Oakland Board of Education affirmed the Appellate Division’s ruling that an employee asserting a failure to accommodate claim does not have to separately establish that she suffered an adverse employment action in addition to demonstrating her employer’s inaction in failing to reasonably accommodate her disability.

  • 05.24.2021

    NJ Appellate Narrows the Road in Auto Dealership’s Sexual Harassment Case
    On May 18, 2021, in McBride v. Atlantic Chrysler Jeep, the New Jersey Appellate Division revived a Sales Consultant’s hostile work environment case against a car dealership after the Law Division previously dismissed it in the dealership’s favor. The employee claimed that she was terminated for rejecting her supervisor’s sexual advances and alleged the dealership was vicariously liable for the supervisor’s conduct. The trial court granted the dealership’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal, the Appellate Division overturned the trial court’s decision and sent the case back to the Law Division to proceed to trial.

  • 05.20.2021

    The Devil is in the Details: NJ District Court Demands Details of Sexual Harassment to Defeat Motion to Dismiss
    On April 12, 2021, the New Jersey District Court for the District of New Jersey in Spence v. New Jersey, et al., granted in part and denied in part a motion to dismiss an employee’s sexual harassment and retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) and the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD). The employee claimed she was sexually harassed by her co-worker and that her supervisors took retaliatory action against her for reporting the alleged sexual harassment. The District Court found that the employee failed to sufficiently plead her sexual harassment claim for lack of pervasive harassment, and in part failed to sufficiently plead her retaliation claim for lack of temporal proximity.

  • 04.12.2021

    Doubling Down on the FAA: NJ District Court Strikes Down the NJLAD’s Prohibition Against Arbitration
    Earlier this year, in a matter of first impression, the Monmouth County Law Division in Janco v. Bay Ridge Automotive Management Corp. held that the amendment to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) which prohibits a waiver of any right or remedy available under the NJLAD was superseded by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). In its decision on March 25, 2021 in New Jersey Civil Justice Institute v. Grewal, the United States District Court followed suit and enjoined the State AG from enforcing Section 12.7 of the NJLAD that would invalidate arbitration agreements between employers and employees. This decision represents a significant victory for employers on the enforceability of arbitration agreements in harassment, discrimination and retaliation cases in New Jersey.

Load More