You searched for: Arbitration Agreement
Attorneys
Nicholas R. Amato
Of Counsel
973.535.7136
Victor Andreou
Associate
973.646.3283
Matthew I. W. Baker
Counsel
973.646.3286
Thomas L. Bellifemine
Associate
973.230.0162
Peter F. Berk
Counsel
973.230.2071
Lawrence Bluestone
Partner
973.535.4434
Jennifer Borek
Partner
973.535.7107
Celia S. Bosco
Counsel
973.230.2088
Joseph A. Bottitta
Of Counsel
973.646.3290
James M. Burns
Managing Partner
973.535.7101
Donald W. Clarke
Counsel
973.387.7804
Harrison C. Clewell
Associate
973.535.4444
David P. Cooke
Of Counsel
973.309.6076
Sadayah Durant-Brown
Associate
973.230.2078
Brigette N. Eagan
Counsel
973.535.7114
Kathleen Barnett Einhorn
Partner
973.535.7115
Rebecca Moll Freed
Partner
973.230.2075
Harris S. Freier
Partner
973.230.2079
Maria R. Fruci
Counsel
973.646.3262
Thomas S. Garlick
Associate
973.646.3273
Bruno Genova
Of Counsel
973.646.3261
Angelo J. Genova
Chairman
973.535.7100
Lauren W. Gershuny
Counsel
973.535.4447
Joseph M. Hannon
Counsel
973.535.7105
William F. Harrison
Partner
973.535.4430
Jeremy M. Brooks
Associate
973.646.3282
Avi R. Jerushalmy
Associate
973.646.3295
Steven Z. Jurista
Of Counsel
973.230.2097
Avi D. Kelin
Counsel
973.646.3267
Matthew Kertz
Partner
973.230.2087
Gregory S. Kinoian
Counsel
973.646.3284
Keith A. Krauss
Senior Counsel
973.535.4441
Latiqua M. Liles
Associate
973.646.3287
Christopher Manley
Associate
973.535.4433
Gary N. Marks
Of Counsel
973.646.3293
Dina M. Mastellone
Partner
732.842.2732
Jennifer Mazawey
Partner
973.535.7126
Nicole L. McCann
Associate
973.535.4443
James J. McGovern III
Partner
973.535.7122
Patrick W. McGovern
Partner
973.535.7129
William F. Megna
Partner
973.230.2074
Charles J. Messina
Partner
973.646.3278
Albert Mezzaroba
Of Counsel
215.564.0444
Jared J. Monaco
Associate
973.535.7121
Emily K. Montagna
Associate
973.230.2080
Angela Pan
Of Counsel
201.469.0100
Eugene T. Paolino
Partner
201.249.8197
Rajiv D. Parikh
Partner
973.535.4446
Nicholas J. Pellegrino
Associate
973.230.2096
John C. Petrella
Partner
973.535.7108
Gerard D. Pizzillo
Counsel
201.249.8361
Scott S. Rever
Counsel
973.387.7801
Jeffrey R. Rich
Partner
732.758.0117
Herschel P. Rose
Associate
973.646.3276
Jennifer Roselle
Partner
973.646.3324
Ralph J. Salerno
Of Counsel
973.535.4432
Brian M. Satz
Of Counsel
973.230.2093
Gina M. Schneider
Of Counsel
973.535.7134
Kenneth J. Sheehan
Counsel
973.646.3292
Douglas E. Solomon
Partner
973.535.7128
Leonard S. Spinelli
Counsel
973.230.2085
Daniel M. Stolz
Partner
973.230.2095
John Suwatson
Counsel
973.535.4431
Harvey Weissbard
Of Counsel
973.230.2084
Yostina Mishriky
Associate
973.230.2072
Practices:
- Alcohol & Regulated Products Law
- Appellate Litigation
- Autonomous Vehicle Law
- Aviation & Aircraft Law
- Banking & Commercial Lending
- Bankruptcy, Reorganization & Creditors’ Rights
- Cannabis Law
- Casino & Gaming Law
- Charter Schools, Public Schools and Public and Private Colleges and Universities
- Class Action Defense
- Commercial & Residential Real Estate Leasing
- Commercial Real Estate & Redevelopment
- Commercial Real Estate Financing
- Complex Commercial Litigation
- Condemnation
- Condominium Law
- Construction Law & Litigation
- Corporate & Business Entity Governance, Ethics & Compliance
- Corporate & Commercial Transactions
- Corporate Law & Business Transactions
- Corporate Political Activity
- Criminal Defense, Investigations & Compliance
- Crisis Management
- Education Law
- Election Law & Litigation
- Electronic Discovery & Information Management
- Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation/ERISA
- Employment Law & Litigation
- Energy & Utility Law
- Environmental Law
- Fashion Law
- Franchise Law
- Health & Hospital Law
- Human Resources Counseling & Compliance
- Immigration Law
- India Focus Group
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- Labor Law
- Land Use & Approvals
- Mediation & Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Nonprofits, Trade Associations & Tax-Exempt Organizations
- Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA)
- Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) Enforcement
- Privacy, Cyber & Data Security
- Procurement Law, Government Contracts & Bid Protest Litigation
- Public Sector Labor Law
- Redevelopment Agreements & Approvals
- Securities Law
- Site Plans & Subdivisions
- Technology & Innovation Law
- Trade Secrets & Non-Competes
- Training & Audit Programs
- Transportation, Shipping, Trucking & Logistics
- Unionized & Union-Free Workplaces
- Variances
- Vendor Political Activity & Ethics Compliance
- Wage & Hour Compliance & Dispute Resolution
- Zoning Ordinances
General Search Results:
-
06.20.2022
Genova Burns Secures Victory for Client - District Court in Connecticut Compels Arbitration in Lawsuit Against Solar Company
In a recent decision in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, Genova Burns LLC secured a victory for client Venture Home Solar, LLC (Venture Home). Three plaintiffs in the case sued alleging violations of Connecticut’s consumer protection laws in connection with Venture Home’s installation of solar panel systems in residential homes. Two of the plaintiffs contracted with different companies, Sunnova Energy Corporation (Sunnova) and Sun Power Capital LLC (Sun Power) for their solar panels, but their contracts provided that Venture Home would be the “Subcontractor/Installer” or “Dealer/Installer” of their solar panel systems. The Sunnova and Sun Power contracts contained provisions requiring that the plaintiffs arbitrate their disputes on an individual basis. Trying to avoid arbitration, the plaintiffs sued Venture Home in Court. -
02.25.2022
To Be Blunt: The NJLAD Does Not Bar Arbitration of Medical Marijuana User’s Employment Claims
On February 15, 2022, the New Jersey Appellate Division upheld a trial court Order compelling arbitration of discrimination and wrongful termination claims brought by a former employee who was terminated for testing positive for marijuana. In a matter of first impression, the Appellate Division in Antonucci v. Curvature Newco, Inc. held that federal law governing arbitration preempts a 2019 amendment to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) invalidating employment agreements that require employees to waive certain rights, with respect to discrimination, retaliation, and/or harassment claims. -
04.12.2021
Doubling Down on the FAA: NJ District Court Strikes Down the NJLAD’s Prohibition Against Arbitration
Earlier this year, in a matter of first impression, the Monmouth County Law Division in Janco v. Bay Ridge Automotive Management Corp. held that the amendment to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) which prohibits a waiver of any right or remedy available under the NJLAD was superseded by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). In its decision on March 25, 2021 in New Jersey Civil Justice Institute v. Grewal, the United States District Court followed suit and enjoined the State AG from enforcing Section 12.7 of the NJLAD that would invalidate arbitration agreements between employers and employees. This decision represents a significant victory for employers on the enforceability of arbitration agreements in harassment, discrimination and retaliation cases in New Jersey. -
03.08.2021
FAA Trumps NJLAD: NJ Superior Court Upholds Employer’s Arbitration Agreement in NJLAD Case
In a matter of first impression, the Monmouth County Law Division in Janco v. Bay Ridge Automotive Management Corp., found that a former employee’s claims brought under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination were subject to the arbitration agreement that she signed when she was first hired. The Court further held that the recent amendment to the Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) which prohibits a waiver of any right or remedy available under the NJLAD was superseded by the Federal Arbitration Act. -
09.21.2020
NJ Supreme Court Enforces Arbitration Agreement Despite Failure to Specify Forum, Arbitrator, & Governing Law
On September 11, 2020, in a unanimous decision, the New Jersey Supreme Court found that New Jersey law does not require that an arbitration agreement identify the arbitrator, name the arbitral forum, describe the arbitrator selection process, or provide for the governing law, so long as the agreement to arbitrate includes a clear and unmistakable waiver of the right to a jury or other civil trial of the claims.